Did Traitor Zardari Cut a Deal to Allow Imperialistic-Satanists to Steal Pakistan Nuclear Weapons?

 

U.S. Has Plan to [Steal] Pakistan Nukes if Country Falls to [Pakistani-
Pakhtoons]
American intelligence sources say the [U.S.] military’s chief [Muslim]-
hunting squad has units operating in Afghanistan on Pakistan’s western
border and is working on a secondary mission to [steal Pakistani]
nuclear arsenals if the [Pakistani-Pashtuns] or [Pakistani-Balochs]
overwhelm Pakistan.
By Rowan Scarborough
USA, 14 May 2009 (FOX News) – The United States has a detailed plan
for infiltrating Pakistan and [stealing] its mobile arsenal of nuclear
warheads if it appears the country is about to fall under the control
of the [Pakistani-Pakhtoons, Pakistani-Balochs] or other Islamic
[Muslims].
American intelligence sources say the operation would be conducted by
[U.S.] Joint Special Operations Command [JSOC], the super-secret
commando unit headquartered at Fort Bragg, N.C. [North Carolina, USA].
JSOC is the [American] military’s chief [Muslim] hunting squad and has
units now operating in Afghanistan on Pakistan’s western border. But a
secondary mission is to [steal] foreign nuclear arsenals – a role for
which JSOC operatives have trained in Nevada [USA].
The mission has taken on added importance in recent months, as Islamic
[Muslims] have taken territory close to the capital of Islamabad and
could destabilize Pakistan’s shaky democrazy [of corrupt dictators,
barbarous tyrants and evil Satanists].
"We have plans to [steal] them [Pakistan’s nuclear weapons] ourselves
if things get out of hand," said a U.S. intelligence source who has
deployed to Afghanistan. "That is a big secondary mission for JSOC in
Afghanistan."
The source said JSOC has been updating its mission plan for the day
[Israeli-Satanist] President [Barack] Obama gives the order to
infiltrate Pakistan.
"Small units could seize them [Pakistani nuclear weapons], disable
them and then centralize them in a secure location," the source said.
A secret [U.S.] Defense Intelligence Agency [DIA] document first
disclosed in 2004 said Pakistan has a nuclear arsenal of 35 [atomic]
weapons. The document said it plans to more than double the [nuclear]
arsenal by 2020.
A [corrupt, traitorous] Pakistani official said the U.S. and his
country [Pakistan] have had an understanding that if either Usama bin
Laden, or his deputy, Ayman Zawahiri, is located, American troops and
[U.S.] air strikes may be used inside [Pakistan] borders to capture or
kill them.
What makes the Pakistan mission especially difficult is that the
[Pakistani] military has its [nuclear] missiles on Soviet-style mobile
launchers and rail lines. U.S. intelligence agencies, using satellite
photos and communication intercepts, is constantly monitoring their
whereabouts.

Other [Pakistani nuclear] warheads are kept in storage.
U.S. technical experts have visited Pakistan to advise the [PPP-MQM-
ANP-JUIF corrupt, treacherous] government on how to maintain and
protect its [nuclear] arsenal.
Also, there are rogue elements inside Pakistan’s military and
intelligence service who could quickly side with the [Pakistani-
Muslims] and make JSOC’s [nuclear arms stealing] mission all the more
difficult.
"It’s relatively easy to track rail-mounted [nuclear] ones with
satellites," said the intelligence source. "Truck-mounted [nuclear
weapons] are more difficult. However, they are all relatively close to
the capital [Islamabad] in areas that the [Asif Ali Zardari-Yousaf
Raza Gillani’s Satanic Mafia] government firmly controls so we don’t
have to look too far."
JSOC is made up of three main elements: Army Delta Force, Navy SEALs
and a high-tech special intelligence unit known as Task Force Orange.
JSOC was instrumental in Iraq in finding and killing Abu Musab
Zarqawi, the deadly and most prominent [Iraqi-Arab-Muslim] leader in
the Middle East.
There is speculation in the intelligence community that a secondary
reason for [U.S.] Army Lt. General Stanley McChrystal being named the
next commander in Afghanistan is that he headed JSOC in 2006-2008 and
is read-in on its contingency missions in Pakistan.
[American] Admiral Michael Mullen, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman,
this month said that based on the information he has seen, Pakistan’s
nuclear warheads are safe.
"I remain comfortable that the nuclear weapons in Pakistan are secure,
that the Pakistani leadership and in particular the military is very
focused on this," he said. "We the United States have invested fairly
significantly over the last three years, to work with them, to improve
that security. And we are satisfied, very satisfied with that
progress. We will continue to do that.

And we all recognize obviously
the worst downside of – with respect to Pakistan is that those
[Pakistani] nuclear weapons come under the control of [real Muslims].
"
[Rowan Scarborough is the author of "Rumsfeld’s War: The Untold Story
of America’s Anti-(Muslim) Commander;" and "Sabotage: America’s
Enemies Within the (American) CIA."]

PRESIDENT, PARLIAMENT AND PEOPLE

Saturday, May 16, 2009

by INAYATULLAH

A PERSONAL VIEW

Will the parliament debate and review the commitments and statements made by Mr. Zardari in USA during his recent visit? Will he recall what Mr. Barack Obama told him in the brief one-on-one meeting with him? Will the members of cabinet be apprised of the discussion that took place between the two and whether the question of drone attacks was addressed?

Was Mr.Zardari authorized to endorse the Memorandum of Understanding on transit trade between Pakistan and Afghanistan and “beyond?” Why was the US secretary of state so very keen about this MOU – so very concerned that she literally presided over the meeting attended by the two presidents? Why did she call it a “historic event” and “an important milestone?” Why were the two presidents practically downgraded to the level of a foreign minister, Hillary herself being one?

Something bilateral was turned into a trilateral affair with a formal signing ceremony arranged at a place thousands of miles away from Kabul and Islamabad.

Good that the matter is being taken up in the National Assembly. Marvi Memon is raising the issue by moving an adjournment motion. Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan, leader of the opposition told the reporters on Wednesday: “we will launch an agitation against the agreement, besides opposing it in the parliament.”

Although the MOU does not mention India, the general feeling is that New Delhi will be a major beneficiary of it. India has been wanting a transit facility to Afghanistan since 1947. Pakistan for good reasons has been resisting the grant of this concession. If India succeeds in securing this facility the consequences for Pakistan’s trade, industry and strategic interests could be most harmful.

It is well known that large scale goods going into Afghanistan via Pakistan have considerably damaged our economy because of resultant smuggling of the stuff back into our territory. It is important that the MOU is thoroughly analyzed and its contents fully examined in the light of the consequential implications. It shouldn’t be treated rhetorically in the parliament for merely scoring points and criticizing the government. Quite a lot is at stake.

India is obviously working behind the scene and Washington is more than willing to oblige New Delhi to strengthen its role in the region.

The added reason why it must be addressed seriously and vigorously is the requirement thrust on the government of Pakistan that the two governments must “undertake to conclude and sign a complete Afghanistan – Pakistan Transit Trade Agreement as early as possible and no later than December 31, 2009.” A coordination committee is also on the cards to “resolve all issues relating to cross – border commerce and inland transit.”

The opening paragraph of the Memorandum emphasizes the “regional linkages and export oriented business development.” The foreign office spokesman has sought to downplay the move by saying that it is a mere MOU and “nothing was finalized.” The fact that the US secretary of state is godfathering it leaves little doubt that the matter will be processed and finalized within the year.

Much will depend on how the opposition does its home work and how it builds up public opinion to dissuade the pliant government of Pakistan from giving in to the American dictat.

It was a mistake and a sign of weakness when in a SAARC meeting the Musharraf government yielded to the Indian demand that Afghanistan be included in the South Asian Association. Ever since the occupation of Afghanistan by USA and the NATO forces an India friendly and anti-Pakistan (Northern Alliance) government has been ruling the country.

India has invested heavily in Afghanistan, wields a lot of influence there and according to our Interior minister uses Afghan territory to destabilize parts of Pakistan. Can we afford this unfriendly neighbour to acquire the facilities which will seriously adversely affect our economy? If at all Pakistan finds itself forced to sign on the dotted line later this year, will it make the concession conditional on similar transit facilities, for Pakistan, to Nepal, Bangladesh and Bhutan across India?

Another important development is the sudden turn around and launching of a full fledged military operation in Swat and the adjoining areas. Not that Sufi and the so called Taliban should have been allowed a free hand to defy the writ of the government and to take over administration in Buner and Deer districts. As pointed out by PML (N) MNA Khawaja Saad Rafiq on the floor of the National Assembly, the matter should have been discussed by the political parties and the members of the parliament before a decision was taken.

The PML (N) leader Mian Nawaz Sharif had addressed a letter to Prime Minister Gilani calling for an all parties’ conference to examine various options. This was not done. Strangely enough, the National Assembly which was pious to debate the issue, was suddenly prorogued and the Prime Minister in a televised speech announced the launch of the military operation.

The operation in fact, was already underway when Mr. Gilani made his speech. The general impression is that a weak Pakistani government had buckled under US administration’s pressure. What indeed is most unfortunate is that little thought was given to the possible fall-out of the massive military action.

The government suddenly found itself facing a crisis of gargantuan proportions. More than a million Pakistanis have become internally displaced people. Islamabad is practically clueless about the repercussions of this large movement of men, women and children to various places including Islamabad. Makeshift arrangements are being made. An already badly governed country has on its hands an added hugely complex task of looking after lakhs of people who have fled from their homes and hearths.

There have been reports, in the past, of miscreants and criminals entering Pakistan in FATA and adjoining areas from Afghanistan – Uzbeks, Tajiks, Afghans and others. Is it farfetched to think that such elements will avail of this mass movement from Swat, Buner and Deer to mix with them and take to nefarious activities at various places?

Belatedly Mr. Gilani has called a meeting of the political parties on Monday. He possibly has fixed it keeping in view the return of his “boss” by then.

What a wonderful president do we have!?

He acts as the virtual “chief executive” of the country. Speaks of “my democracy” “my army” and “my parliament” and keeps away for more than two weeks while the country is in deep trouble. Will he make a little amends by visiting Swat and some of the camps in the NWFP? He is expected to do so as he is the head of the state and chairman of the ruling political party. Hopefully Mr. Gilani too will also pick up the courage to go to Mardan and Swabi relief camps and share the grief and misery of the hapless displaced families.

A great opportunity has come for the Punjab province to go out of the way to provide maximum possible relief to the IDPs. Shahbaz Sharif can show his worth and versatility by spending time with the displaced people.

As a suggestion, how about deputing, a competent minister, whole-time along with adequate staff and funds to undertake relief operations, for a period of three months or so.

Tailpiece: The Chief Justice of Pakistan has taken up the indefensible imposition of levies on the sale of petrol which keep its price pegged at a high level at the expense of the people and the economy. Hopefully the government will heed the Supreme Court advice and not hide behind unacceptable excuses.

There might have been no such directive from the court if a compassionate government had been, in place.

The writer is a political and international relations analyst.

Email: pacade@brain.net.pk

Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons Cause for Concern

More Radical Insiders Will Have Access to Nuclear Materials and Pose New Issues

By BEN ARNOLDY, staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan, May 17, 2009

Some of Prof. Pervez Hoodbhoy’s nuclear physics students will go on to oversee Pakistan’s atomic bombs. That gives him cause.

In this file photo, Pakistan’s Babur Hatf VII cruise missile takes off during a test flight from an undisclosed location. Radical insiders may be more of a risk to gain access to nuclear materials than Islamic fighters.

(Reuters)

"The student body has become very conservative, very Islamist, their outward appearance has changed," says Professor Hoodbhoy, the chair of the physics department at Quaid-i-Azam University in Islamabad. "It’s row after row of these burqa women."

Students avoid talking politics with Hoodbhoy, a cautionary voice on nuclear weapons in a nation that takes boisterous pride in having them. "They think I’m on the wrong side," he says.

International concerns are mounting again about the security of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons as fighting rages with the Taliban. But thanks to safeguards, experts worry much less about the Islamic fighters in the hills making off with a warhead. It’s the radicals among the educated — potential insiders — who are in a more realistic position to abscond with nuclear material and know how to use it.

An Air War veteran writes his Piece

by Shireen M Mazari Saturday, May 16, 2009 When the mainstream biographies by civil and military bureaucrats in Pakistan tend to be tedious rationalisations of their stay in the corridors of power, including military dictatorships, Air Commodore Sajad Haider’s book, "Flight of the Falcon" breaks this mode. Newly launched by Vanguard Books, it is a most fascinating study of not only Haider’s interesting and adventurous life but also of the Pakistan Air Force itself. Sajad Haider has always been outspoken with a "no-holds barred" approach to life and his life story reflects this most vividly, with his near-death encounters while flying as well as his turbulent times fighting against an unjust court martial which eventually exonerated him. Interesting anecdotes abound in the book reflecting different facets of Haider’s life in the PAF – including his run-in with the Shah of Iran in Washington, his unfulfilled true love and other amusing flirtatious encounters. However, the book is an important "must read" for all Pakistanis, because it opens up the evolution of the institution of the Pakistan Air Force and the brave and audacious officers who laid the strong foundations. Haider shows the commitment of the early officer cadre, which flew their machines without high-tech back-up systems in a seemingly cavalier fashion. It is more than just the story of the institution. Haider provides the human element to the story of the Pakistan Air Force. In fact, by describing the lifestyle of the PAF reflected in its socialising patterns in the Officers’ Mess, Haider draws a picture of the elite lifestyle of Pakistan during the pre-Zia days and the social tolerance that was taken for granted. He also paints a nostalgic picture of days when officers rode motor bikes or old cars, travelled in second-class railway compartments and barely had enough money for fuelling the borrowed car of a friend. That these facts are described in an affectionate and matter-of-fact manner shows how simple and unaffected the officer of those days was. Committed to flying and his country and taking risks for a national cause – the fighter pilot was a heroic, romantic and dare-devilish figure who cast his imprint on the PAF in its heyday. The tragedy of institutional decay that set in into the PAF is also recounted vividly. As we have watched our armed forces move from being venerated to being critiqued for their continuous political interventions, we can understand how individuals have played a major role in institutional strengthening and decay. Haider shows us the invaluable contributions of air chiefs like Asghar Khan and Nur Khan as well as their early successors. He also shows how the political machinations of certain air chiefs began the professional rot within the PAF. Describing the Attock Conspiracy case, and the court martial that ensued, Haider describes the latter as "a virtual genocide of gallant fighter pilots, most of them with Sitara-e-Jurats pinned on their chests". We see the politicisation that crept into the military, and understand why military heroes were gradually replaced by military villains in the eyes of the Pakistani nation. Some myths about the 1965 and 1971 wars are also exposed. Haider of course was the decorated war hero of the 1965 war and he has critiqued the role of the GHQ leadership in both these wars. What is fascinating is his assertion that the PAF did even better in the 1971 war with India than it had performed in 1965. According to him, in 1971, the "plans and performance of the PAF were superb and indisputably better that in 1965" and to support this claim he cites Indian government figures of Indian Air Force losses. According to Haider the military debacle of 1971 can be laid firmly at the feet of the president and GHQ whose plans were "flawed". As he put it, the "leadership had cold feet when the moment of truth arrived on November 24, 1971, as the Indian invasion of East Pakistan began." Perhaps it is not surprising to see how Haider ended his career with the PAF – an institution he joined after being inspired by Quaid-e-Azam Mohammed Ali Jinnah’s words at a gathering where he was present. After having gone through the rollercoaster of the PAF in the Bhutto years, Sajad Haider finally called it quits after he stood up to Dictator Ziaul Haq and told him exactly what he thought of his regime, regretting the level to which the military had been reduced in civilian eyes. Thus ended the illustrious career of a fighter pilot of the Pakistan Air Force – undaunted in the face of adversity; but unwilling to compromise on his beloved PAF. The writer is a defence analyst. Email: callstr@hotmail.com http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=177909

‘Afghanistan and Pakistan: Quest for Peace or Recipe for War?’

 

By Ahmed Rashid

On Monday, April 4, veteran journalist Ahmed Rashid addressed a select crowd at Karachi’s Mohatta Palace Museum. Not surprisingly, the subject of his talk was He argued that Pakistan was facing a major existential crisis: ‘I no longer say that there’s a creeping Talibanisation in Pakistan, it’s a galloping Talibanisation.’

Where did the Taliban come from?

The myths about the Taliban need to be clarified. They are not an extension of an external threat, they are not being funded by Russia or India. In the 1990s, the Taliban in Afghanistan were fighting the Northern Alliance, and thousands of Pashtuns went to fight as foot soldiers on behalf of the Taliban. In 2001, the Afghan Taliban fled to Pakistan. Pakistani Taliban, who previously had little clout, became hosts of the Afghan Taliban and earned much money for their assistance. From 2001 to 2004, the Pakistani Taliban grew in numbers and influence and became radicalized because of their proximity to the Afghan Taliban. They planned and mobilized to establish a Taliban ‘emirate’ or state in Fata and the expansion of that idea of statehood is what we see happening today.

Pakistani Taliban expanding

The leadership of the Taliban is now in Pakistan and they have stated their intention of overthrowing the government here. The Taliban are linking up with groups in Pakistan and the Pakistani Taliban movement is turning into a multiethnic movement. Groups cultivated to fight in Kashmir have joined up with the Pakistani Taliban, and include Punjabis with organizations such as Lashkar-e-Taiba and Harkatul Mujahideen. Now, some 40 groups in Pakistan are loosely affiliated with the Pakistan – the several years of progressive diplomacy with India exacerbated the rise of different Taliban-affiliated factions. For that reason, Pakistan faces a more dangerous situation than Afghanistan, where Tajik and Uzbek fighters were not permitted to join the Afghan Taliban movement.

Issues in Pakistani governance

Pakistan is also weaker because of a raging economic crisis, the ongoing insurgency in Balochistan, and a political crisis. The PPP government has wasted one year vying with the PML-N for power rather than tackling the Taliban threat. Meanwhile, ANP, which was supposed to serve as secular face of Frontier province, has collapsed (ANP officials are being targeted by Taliban in northern areas).

Before 2008, the Musharraf government allowed the Taliban to resettle in Pakistan from Afghanistan. Musharraf wanted to maintain the jihadi nexus as a force against the Indians. Also, the emphasis then was on getting rid of Al Qaeda, the Taliban were not seen as a major threat.

After 2004/2005, when military operations did begin in Fata, the government pursued a stop-and-start policy, which involved several peace deals that did not hold. In the meantime, the Pakistan government and army failed to protect the people of the Fata and the traditional tribal hierarchies that were pro-Pakistan. About 300 maliks of tribes were killed and by 2007, there were half a million refugees from Fata in Pakistan. Having lost the goodwill of the population in Fata, the government will find it hard to reenter the area and rebuild traditional tribal structures.

American failures

How did we get from 2001 to where we are today? The Bush government got distracted by Iraq, which provided a diversion of attention and resources from the situation in Afghanistan. Instead of having an on-the-ground plan for capacity building in Afghanistan, the US supported warlords – instead of empowering the centre, regional powers were bolstered. Plus, little was done about the drug trade, which is now the main source of funding for the Taliban (it is estimated at 300 million dollars, but Rashid believes the real figures are triple that amount). Instead of defeating Taliban in Afghanistan, Americans routed them to Pakistan.

Obama policy

US President Barack Obama is now doing what Bush should have done in Afghanistan (troop surge, capacity building, securing the ground to ensure that presidential elections can take place this August). In Pakistan, however, American options are limited. There was a hope that after February 2008 elections, there would be a strong coalition government that could serve as a civilian partner for Obama to partner with. After all, army has proved unreliable ally (especially since it still thinks that India is the main enemy; army officials dislike Indian presence in Afghanistan; and army officials don’t like Karzai and other Afghan leaders). However, there is no one for America to partner with. PM? President? Opposition leader? They have all proved too weak.

As a result, US is asking for aid to help Paksitan, but there is very little trust and faith in Pakistan amongst the Congress. The aid that will be given will be packed with conditionalities that Pakistan won’t be able to accept. Congress is asking, who will we give this aid to?

India question

There is a tit-for-tat game between India and Pakistan whereby they support nationalist insurgencies in each other’s countries (so while India may be giving funds in Balochistan, Pakistan is helping out rebels in Assam). But India is not funding the Taliban. India realizes that the Taliban will be at their border next and they have nothing to gain from supporting the militants.

Regional strategy

New focus of Obama administration is regional policy – get Afghanistan’s six neighbors involved and make them sort out regional stability and set a common agenda. But first, bilateral issues will have to be sorted: Indo-Pak will have to clear the air, Pakistan and Central Asian states will have to reach understandings, and Iran and the US will have to start negotiating. This way, Afghanistan is not only a problem, it becomes a trigger for regional problem solving. This is one of the most doable and productive aspects of the Obama policy for Af-Pak.

Fallacies of Swat deal (Nizam-i-Adl Regulation)

The ANP thought that the deal would be contained within Swat, but that was very misguided thinking. The Taliban have an expansionist agenda. They make deals in one areas so that they can secure it and then move into other areas. There has also been no cessation of their killing of ANP and other government officials and they have not agreed to lay down their arms. Instead of achieving anything, the Swat deal formalises a different form of law and governance for one part of Pakistan, thus weakening the government.

The law in Swat is Taliban law, and it’s nonsense to say that the Swatis have been practicing Sharia for decades. The Taliban law has nothing to do with the mild form of Sufi-influenced Sharia that Swatis have had from 1960s.

Government was definitely taken by surprise by the speed with which Taliban moved on from Swat to Buner, Dir, etc. They will not stop and government should realise their ultimate goal of toppling Islamabad. To that end, the operation in Swat is welcome. But the question is: will it be a sustained offensive?

Also, there are already one million IDPs who have escaped from Fata and northern areas. If the army is seriously going to tackle Taliban menace, it must learn counter-insurgency tactics and get the right equipment to target Taliban without damaging entire villages.

Then, we have these stupid people who wish to represent Islam

PICTURES FROM LONDON ….THIS IS BEYOND SCARY!!!

Lifted from an email I got today!!!

Hello my friend, I cut some of the racist comments; they are all too predictable. On the other hand, this will not do Islam and Muslims any favours. It only induces hatred.

These pictures are of Muslims marching through the STREETS OF LONDON during their recent ‘Religion of Peace Demonstration.’? Why would anyone think that we should be at war with such nice, peaceful Muslims?!? All Christians need to know. You need to forward this one to everyone! These pictures tell it all!? Muslims have stated that England will be the first country they take over!? These are pictures not shown on American TV or in American Newspapers (as they might help the Presidents war on ), but were forwarded by a Canadian who thought All Christians ought to know!?